Skip to main content

Different Eschatological Schools

Eschatology, What Is That?

Eschatology1 is a branch of theology that investigates how 'end' time events will occur.

Why Is It Relevant To This Subject?

To examine the question of The One People of God, we have to look at a number of competing schools of eschatology which hold different views about 'end' events. This activity on our part is necessary because views about the Church, cultural Israel, their relationship and their present status before God tend to be correlated with different views about end-time events (eschatologies).

What Different Eschatological Schools Exist?

To simplify matters we could say three main groupings exist: Preterism, Historicism, and Futurism (with variations within each).

Preterism claims that most of the book of The Revelation has already been fulfilled. Some within this group would even claim that Jesus returned in the judgement upon Jerusalem in AD 70. Doubtless, many will find Preterism to be an odd2 view because most evangelicals at least, are steeped in some form of Futurism (see below).

Historicism, as the name might suggest, believes that much of Revelation was fulfilled over the centuries until the present time. Jesus is yet to come (as in Rev 21). Many of these folk are post-millennialists, that is, they believe that Jesus will come after the millennium (Rev 20.2, 4, 5, 6).

Futurism is probably better known than the other two and more popular (IMO). Futurists believe (as the name suggests) that most of The Revelation is yet to happen in a time future to our own. Jesus will return before  the millennium (hence, premillennialists) to set up a millennial kingdom.

Futurism is important for our study because it contains a strong faction within the tradition who can be called classical dispensationalists.

Classical Dispensationalism

Classical3 dispensationalism gets its name from its characteristic dividing of redemptive history into seven4 divine administrations (or 'dispensations')

Within dispensationalism is the conviction that a clear, demarcation line exists between the Church and ethnic Israel, and that God is pursuing two different agendas with each of these two distinct peoples.


That God in Christ came to redeem Israel but He was rejected at the national level by the people of Israel (Acts 2.22-23; 3.12-15; 4.10-11; 7.51-53; etc).

That God then put his plans for Israel 'on hold' and took up a new redemptive undertaking with any who would receive his Son, the Lord Jesus as King. Hence, a 'church age' ensued and continues to this day. 


However, most importantly, this 'church age' does not suggest that God has finished with national Israel: He has made unconditional promises to Abram/Abraham and his descendants (Gen 12.1-3; 15. 5-6, 7-11, 12-16, 17-21) and as surely as God is true to His Word He will keep these promises. Most importantly for us, classical dispensationalism is going to occupy our attention because it has a specific eschatology that drives a wedge between the Church and Israel while calling both of them 'the people of God'. We will have to examine whether classical dispensationalism can maintain this position in the face of the biblical evidence.


1. Eschatology is defined as 'the study of the end'. Eschaton in Greek means 'end' or 'last things'.
2. To gain a better understanding of Preterism we have to imagine being disciples of Christ before the overthrown and sacking of Jerusalem and see how many scriptures we now take to be yet future might have been understood by those then living.
3. More recent types of dispensationalism include: modified, and progressive dispensationalism which are to be distinguished from the classical dispensationalism which began in the 19th century.
4. Typically listed as: Innocence (pre-Fall), Conscience (Fall to Flood), Human Government (Flood to Abraham), Promise (Abram's call to Exodus), Law (Moses to Christ), Grace (the Church era), and the Kingdom (the Millennial period of 1,000 years).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God's Proof of His Love-While We Were Still Enemies

I've just come across an excerpt from a wonderful book I have, The Divine Forbearance or The Dynamics of Forgiveness (2001) by Paul T. Harrison 1 . I want to focus on some points he makes from Rom 5.1-11 concerning the love of God. In Romans ch 4, the subject is faith: 'the means by which we are rightwised 2 to God' (Harrison, p. 52). But what, Harrison asks, arouses faith; what 'has Christ revealed about God that makes us able to trust Him?' Fire of God Ministries International Church-see http://fireofgodservants.blogspot.com.au And to that question he answers, God's forgiving love . God's love is so faithful and true that we may depend on it absolutely. Why is that so? That is explored in Rom 5.6-11. Our status before God as ungodly sinners (Rom 5.6, 8) in the past meant that we were the 'enemies of God' (Rom 5.10). Think of that! Being an enemy of God means to be subject to his wrath (Rom 5.9) and displeasure. People don't give their live...

Reigning With Christ by F J Huegel

Reigning With Christ by F J Huegel (1963) is a book of only 88 pages yet it is filled with crucial truths of the Christian faith organised around the theme of the enthroned believer . It's fair to say that the theme he concisely addresses in this small book is much neglected today. For the press of technological life with its bustle and speed is such that we can forget that present life, so ' real' to us, is temporary (2 Cor 4.18) and as in the first century, 'the form [Greek, "schema"] of the world is passing away' (1Cor 7.31). It's easy to read this work and though it has 20 chapters, they are short and pithy. However, reading it requires a meditative attitude so as to allow the Spirit to work on our hearts.

Christian Atheism!

" The great lesson that our blessed Lord inculcates here...is that God is in all things, and that we are to see the Creator in the glass [mirror] of every creature; that we should use and look upon nothing as separate from God, which indeed is a kind of practical atheism; but with a true magnificence of thought survey heaven and earth and all that is therein as contained by God in the hollow of his hand, who by his intimate presence holds them all in being, who pervades and activates the whole created frame, and is in a true sense the soul of the universe." These pungent words were given to me by an overseas correspondent and come from a sermon by John Wesley (1748) on the 'Sermon on the Mount'. Part of the context for his words apparently were that Wesley originally baulked at the idea of preaching in the open air until he realised that the Lord Jesus had preached outside! But, more especially for our edification is that Wesley fixed on the truth that nothing ...