Skip to main content

The Law and the Messiah (2)

The Character of the Messiah (Christ)


In the second part of Matthew 22.34-46 Jesus asks them a question. It's an important question because it relates directly to the matters raised in the first question-and-answer section found in an earlier post which indirectly brings up the issue of what can be done about our failure to keep the Law.

Jesus takes his turn to ask them a question in line with the rules of formal debate of that time between disputants. He asks questions about the Messiah (Christ). 
Is the Messiah just a man or more than a man? This issue is the one on which Jesus is concerned to concentrate with them.

Whose son is He? Jesus asks. 
To which they reply, 'the son of David'.

Jesus draws their attention to Psalm 110.1 in which David says: The Lord (Jehovah) said to my Lord (the Messiah), 'Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet.'

Jesus presses his point, 'If David calls the Messiah 'Lord' how can the Messiah be his son?'

[At this point, we need to realise that it was accepted by the Pharisees that Ps 110.1 was a Messianic reference.]

We have now to see why the Pharisees were in a doctrinal jam. They were because they had a low view of the Messiah; they imagined him as a great but essentially human warrior who would come to deliver them from their enemies. 

Our Deliverer-Mediator Re the Law's Demands


But the inspired Scripture given by David says that although it may be correct to say that the Messiah is David's son he is far more than that. Firstly, He is David's 'Lord' or 'Master'. Secondly, He is placed at 'the right hand of God' and is to have 'God put His (Messiah's) enemies under His feet'. This position accords that One with divine status, far above David.

And that being the case, the Messiah can be a Deliverer who can mediate between God and man (1 Tim 2.5-6) because he is human and divine. No wonder that his question led to their loss of enthusiasm about asking Him questions. Jesus Himself was The Answer to their questions if only they had had eyes to see!

When we fail to love God rightly then to Jesus we must go. CS Lewis (in Mere Christianity) even suggested that it's perhaps a necessary step to try and try to keep the law of Love and to fail over and over again. In that way we learn that we cannot do it in our own strength; that our failure is God's opportunity to show His grace and our chance to experience His continuing forgiveness. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reigning With Christ by F J Huegel

Reigning With Christ by F J Huegel (1963) is a book of only 88 pages yet it is filled with crucial truths of the Christian faith organised around the theme of the enthroned believer . It's fair to say that the theme he concisely addresses in this small book is much neglected today. For the press of technological life with its bustle and speed is such that we can forget that present life, so ' real' to us, is temporary (2 Cor 4.18) and as in the first century, 'the form [Greek, "schema"] of the world is passing away' (1Cor 7.31). It's easy to read this work and though it has 20 chapters, they are short and pithy. However, reading it requires a meditative attitude so as to allow the Spirit to work on our hearts.

God's Proof of His Love-While We Were Still Enemies

I've just come across an excerpt from a wonderful book I have, The Divine Forbearance or The Dynamics of Forgiveness (2001) by Paul T. Harrison 1 . I want to focus on some points he makes from Rom 5.1-11 concerning the love of God. In Romans ch 4, the subject is faith: 'the means by which we are rightwised 2 to God' (Harrison, p. 52). But what, Harrison asks, arouses faith; what 'has Christ revealed about God that makes us able to trust Him?' Fire of God Ministries International Church-see http://fireofgodservants.blogspot.com.au And to that question he answers, God's forgiving love . God's love is so faithful and true that we may depend on it absolutely. Why is that so? That is explored in Rom 5.6-11. Our status before God as ungodly sinners (Rom 5.6, 8) in the past meant that we were the 'enemies of God' (Rom 5.10). Think of that! Being an enemy of God means to be subject to his wrath (Rom 5.9) and displeasure. People don't give their live

Christian Atheism!

" The great lesson that our blessed Lord inculcates here...is that God is in all things, and that we are to see the Creator in the glass [mirror] of every creature; that we should use and look upon nothing as separate from God, which indeed is a kind of practical atheism; but with a true magnificence of thought survey heaven and earth and all that is therein as contained by God in the hollow of his hand, who by his intimate presence holds them all in being, who pervades and activates the whole created frame, and is in a true sense the soul of the universe." These pungent words were given to me by an overseas correspondent and come from a sermon by John Wesley (1748) on the 'Sermon on the Mount'. Part of the context for his words apparently were that Wesley originally baulked at the idea of preaching in the open air until he realised that the Lord Jesus had preached outside! But, more especially for our edification is that Wesley fixed on the truth that nothing